Club of Rome and Education

m-link">his New World Order types than I share with
The Club of Rome:bleeding heart naïve do-gooders who seek
Eugenics is a lot like all the other arrows in the quiversomething they have not fully examined. I think
of the social engineer. Francis Fukayama’shelping babies exist and take food from the mouths
book The End of History and The Last Man is aof others in India was not a godly or good thing, for
powerful reminder of how much ‘absoluteexample. The Club of Rome and I share a great deal
religions’ are mere tool for the elite, and Iin terms of how we view the opportunities and
think everyone should read what he bluntly states. Inproblems that our leaders must address. Here is a
order to design or engineer a quality environment wegood point they make.
must have ethics or principles that allow decisions to“Systems of education are less and less adapted
be made that benefit all life on earth rather than ato the new issues, to the new emerging global
few elites who operate to benefit their cronies andsociety we are presently involved in. New priorities
share a little with their paladins in some Physiocraticforce us to redefine the role of education, which
‘trickle down’ approach to the governanceshould be conceived as a permanent learning process.
and resources or opportunities that humanity has theTransmission of knowledge is no longer sufficient, and
duty to fulfill according to some over-riding purpose.new objectives such as developing one's own
That purpose might be divine but it must makepotential and creativity, or the capacity of adaptation
sense and be commonly apprehended or shared. Ito change are becoming essential in a rapidly changing
happen to think there is an intelligence and collectiveworld.
conscious design. I also think we are part of thisThe Club of Rome considers that education is both
design and can make mincemeat or a thoroughpart of the global problematique and also an essential
botchery of it. We are individually responsible fortool to become an effective actor in control of one's
being like gods as Jesus (John 10:34) and all so manyown life and within society. If there are "Limits to
adepts have made eloquently apparent. We are partGrowth", there are "No Limits to Learning" (titles of
of God and should help she/he/it achieve what istwo Reports to the Club of Rome).” (1)
RIGHT.Their recommendations to limit population growth can
Is that an elitist attitude? Maybe it is at some point,be seen from many points of view but their
because I am not one who caters to the destructionprognostications of doom and gloom have not
of the human gene pool or one who thinks anyoneconsidered various technologies which continue to
deserves a free ride at the heart of it. That is not tomake it possible that the outcomes their reports
suggest that I think everyone should not be enabledhave predicted will occur. In fact there are
and encouraged far more than has been done in thetechnologies I think they are not even aware of if
WASP world of history in the last two millennia andyou go by what they say on their web site.
more. I probably share more with Thomas Paine and